California HealthCare Foundation – Supporting ideas and innovations to improve health care for all Californians.

Where the Money Goes: Understanding Medi-Cal’s High-Cost Beneficiaries

The Lewin Group and Ingenix Government Solutions

Seven percent of Medi-Cal beneficiaries accounted for more than three-quarters of fee-for-service program expenditures in fiscal year 2008. This snapshot makes recommendations for better controlling costs.

July 2010

In fiscal year 2009, California spent $47 billion on Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program. As is common with other states' Medicaid programs and health insurance generally, spending was highly concentrated among a small number of beneficiaries: 7% of Medi-Cal beneficiaries accounted for more than three-quarters of fee-for-service program expenditures in fiscal year 2008.

Understanding this small but expensive group of beneficiaries is essential if California is to slow the growth of Medi-Cal spending, which accounts for an increasing share of the state budget. Although there is no single definition of a high-cost beneficiary, the analysis in this data snapshot considers high-cost beneficiaries as individuals whose Medi-Cal fee-for-service claims in 2008 cost $10,000 or more.

Among the key findings:

  • High-cost beneficiaries are a diverse group, spanning the age spectrum and presenting a wide array of physical and mental health conditions.
  • Most cases are not a function of episodic or catastrophic care; high-cost beneficiaries tend to have continuous Medi-Cal coverage and incur high claims for at least three years.
  • Among beneficiaries with claims costs greater than $10,000, nearly two-thirds have multiple conditions and more than one-third have co-occurring physical and mental health conditions.
  • Nearly half of high-cost Medi-Cal beneficiaries have Medicare coverage.
  • Long term care is a primary cost driver for high-cost Medi-Cal beneficiaries with Medicare coverage, whereas inpatient hospital admissions drive expenditures for those without Medicare coverage.
  • Annual expenditures for the 1,000 most costly beneficiaries averaged $502,465 per person.

The analysis concludes that new approaches are needed to better integrate physical health, mental health, and long term care services for the high-cost population, and offers several recommendations for managing and coordinating care more effectively.

The complete snapshot is available as a Document Download. Also available is an Excel file showing the aggregated data that lie behind the individual slides.

Reader Comments

As a follow-up to the third comment, in FY2008-09, Medi-Cal accounted for just under one-fifth of state general fund expenditures of $90.9 billion (see page 8 of the CHCF report, Medi-Cal Facts and Figures). This excludes federal, bond and special funds (from both the numerator and denominator). As illustrated on page 9 of Medi-Cal Facts and Figures, federal funds account for over half of the Medi-Cal budget.

Including all funds, total state spending was $195.5 billion in FY2008-09 according to the Legislative Analyst's Office. By this measure, Medi-Cal's $46.6 billion budget accounted for one-fourth of total state spending that year.
Someone help me out here, pls. I thought the total state budget was
somewhere around $112Bn. That would mean Medicaid/Medical was about
41% of the total. Really?

For profit v. non-profit: From what I've read, there are differences, but mainly, it's how they spread the money around. Not-for-profit doesn't mandate lower compensation, nor force efficiency does it?
This is where PACE (Program of All Inclusive Care for the Elderly) Providers help. They take high long term care utilizers with multiple conditions and drastically lower hospitalization and SNF entry rates by doing high-touch health and well being maintenance with an extensive interdisciplinary team. It is the wave of the future and we are lucky to have five PACE programs in California so far. And, Aline, to your point, they are not for profit!
Our current system privatizes the profits ( young and healthy usually have a private plan they pay into) and socializes the losses..elderly and costly longterm diseases are usualyy on tazpayers dime. Either they should open open medicaid to "buy ins" by healthy profitable patients, or they should force the private plans to take keep the >65 crown and the very sick.